W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:51:03 +0100
Message-ID: <4B7D8C17.9010208@gmx.de>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 18.02.2010 19:16, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, can we get back to the discussion *why* there is this
>> restriction to the syntax (considering it's not implemented, and all
>> kinds of other garbage are allowed)?
>
> Isn't that now out of scope for this working group? I thought the parsing
> of URLs was now an IRI matter.

For now it's not, until you change the spec's reference.

That being said -- what do you *want* IRIbis to define here? As the UAs 
do not implement what you specified I'm wondering what the rational for 
this special case could be.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 18:54:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:02 GMT