W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41))

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:26:52 +0100
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100201112652967571.9bd736c0@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Henri Sivonen, Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:32:20 +0200:
> On Jan 31, 2010, at 23:11, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> 
>> http://www.amplesdk.com/examples/aml/maps/
>> 
>> The page is served as text/HTML (more specifically with the HTML5 
>> doctype) - to all Web browsers, and implements AmpleSDK's XML language 
>> - AML - with namespaces and everything, inside the <script> element.
>> 
>> Perhaps limiting namespaces to the <script> element and children of the 
>> <script> element is worth a shot? (My 2.5 cent.)
> 
> The whole point of this technique is that the script element has no 
> element children when parsed as text/html. Putting an XML-looking 
> text child in script is already a permitted extension point. 
> (However, the xmlns:aml="http://www.amplesdk.com/ns/aml" bit on the 
> script start tag is not permitted by the spec.)

OK - got it. ;-) But then there should also be no risk in allowing 
xmlns:aml="etc" on the very <scrip> element, I presume?
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 1 February 2010 10:27:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:13 UTC