xml-uri@w3.org from June 2000 by thread

Why I moved from Forbid to Literal Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 30 June)

Database example was: The Kesselman/Connoly proposal Tim Berners-Lee (Friday, 30 June)

Re: The Kesselman/Connoly proposal (was Re: Re Deprecate /Undefined ) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 26 June)

Background material, belated keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 26 June)

I have a dream Tim Bray (Sunday, 25 June)

relative URIs and local lexical scopes: "Unique Base"? Larry Masinter (Saturday, 24 June)

Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Saturday, 24 June)

Another endorsement of Dan Connolly's recent proposal David G. Durand (Friday, 23 June)

Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump andissues check) John Cowan (Friday, 23 June)

Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Paul Grosso (Friday, 23 June)

Thank you Dan David G. Durand (Thursday, 22 June)

namespace usage as assertions Manola,Frank A. (Wednesday, 21 June)

The tail shouldn't wag the dog Paul W. Abrahams (Wednesday, 21 June)

Fixed base James Clark (Tuesday, 20 June)

Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Tim Bray (Monday, 19 June)

Worth repeating Tim Bray (Monday, 19 June)

Rehash of literal-vs-relative argument status Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 19 June)

Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Monday, 19 June)

Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 19 June)

Personal view Daniel Veillard (Saturday, 17 June)

Fwd: Re: How namespace names might be used John Aldridge (Friday, 16 June)

(no subject) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)

Personal view John Aldridge (Thursday, 15 June)

Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Michael Champion (Wednesday, 14 June)

Context and... Re: the case of two bats Jonathan Borden (Wednesday, 14 June)

some uses of relative URI as namespace names David Carlisle (Tuesday, 13 June)

essential test cases? Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 13 June)

Re: PUBLIC/SYSTEM distinction (was Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 13 June)

1343 messages later Simon St.Laurent (Monday, 12 June)

Annotation protocols [was: How namespace names might be used] Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 12 June)

How are semantics named? Tim Bray (Monday, 12 June)

(no subject) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 12 June)

(no subject) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 12 June)

How namespace names might be used Tim Bray (Saturday, 10 June)

More nervousness about NS Names bearing semantics Tim Bray (Saturday, 10 June)

Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec Tim Bray (Saturday, 10 June)

FW: D. Carlisle lone user (was : Microsoft tools) James O. Luke (Friday, 9 June)

OID URN namespace.... Michael Mealling (Friday, 9 June)

XML Base and XPath absolutizing of URIs John Boyer (Thursday, 8 June)

A proposed solution David Turner (Thursday, 8 June)

Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)

Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Paul Grosso (Thursday, 8 June)

Re: On, and on, and on... was: Mechanism, not policy [was: Attribute uniqueness...] keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)

Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)

Uncertainty on xml-dev John Cowan (Thursday, 8 June)

The "deprecate/fixed-base" option John Cowan (Wednesday, 7 June)

Re: A new proposal (was: Re: which layer for URI processing?) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 7 June)

New text for Namespaces 2.0 Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 6 June)

Re: how does XML Base affects well-formedness? [was: red/green XML] Paul Grosso (Tuesday, 6 June)

Re: how does XML Base affects well-formedness? [was: red/green XML] keshlam@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 6 June)

how does XML Base affects well-formedness? [was: red/green XML] Paul Grosso (Tuesday, 6 June)

what "huge problem" with XML Base? [was: red/green XML] Paul Grosso (Tuesday, 6 June)

Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck Tim Berners-Lee (Tuesday, 6 June)

Yet Another Modest Proposal: [was] Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" Sam Hunting (Tuesday, 6 June)

Banning relative - No real damage? Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 5 June)

Request for status dump and issues check keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 5 June)

a personal conclusion..... Michael Mealling (Friday, 2 June)

"data:,<name>" proposal adds an extra level Larry Masinter (Friday, 2 June)

Base-less fears (was Moving On...) Jonathan Marsh (Thursday, 1 June)

Re: Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 1 June)

Re: Chaos, Process Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 1 June)

RE: URIs quack like a duck Arnold, Curt (Thursday, 1 June)

Re: Namespace names: a modification of a semi-serious proposal Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 1 June)

a clarification? Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)

Comparing URI references as strings David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)

Re: Injective Quality (Was: Re: URIs quack like a duck) Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 31 May)

Re: RDF/XML/Internet Collisons, Process (was Moving on) Graham Klyne (Thursday, 1 June)

Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)

Re: URIs quack like a duck David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)

Re: Attribute uniqueness test: a radical proposal David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)

Re: Namespace-by-retrieval is consistent and coherent David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)

Last message date: Friday, 30 June 2000 19:18:59 UTC