- From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 17:20:54 +0100 (BST)
- To: connolly@w3.org
- CC: xml-uri@w3.org
> Strictly speaking, no; strictly speaking, the resource identified > by the URI ipso fact is _represented_ by the schema document. So what on earth is it doing at a namespace URI if you believe that implies that that URI identifies a namespace. Schema and namespaces are not very closely related concepts. > Let's hope the case where you get nothing is the rare exception. I'd expect its the most common case. > But, without more information (such as schemaLocation), > XSV will not, nor will SIRPAC (an sort of schema validator > for RDF http://www.w3.org/RDF/Implementations/SiRPAC/). Schema validation is ____not____ names[ace processing. No more than DTD validation is well formed XMML parsing. > i.e. not all processors that use conventions layered on > top of the namespace spec will be able to make sense > of your homepage. whoever said that they would? > I have not, and I don't believe TimBL has either. If you state that the resource identified by the namespace name is the namespace and I use a namespace name which identifies a resource which is not a namespace, it seems to me that you are saying something is wrong somewhere. David
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2000 12:26:10 UTC