- From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 17:36:04 +0100 (BST)
- To: keshlam@us.ibm.com
- CC: xml-uri@w3.org
> both immediately and with an eye toward possible reconsideration > of absolutize in the XML 2.0 timeframe. One strong argument for not making the behaviour undefined is that it leaves the door open to restart the discussion later. I think "undefined" is the worst possible outcome (after "absolute", which would be an unmitigated disaster) David
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2000 12:44:24 UTC