- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 18:13:13 -0400
- To: michaelm@netsol.com, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
Michael Mealling wrote: > But they don't need to resolve the URI in order to be able to > reason about it. They just need the URI to act like a URI... True. But namespace names are not URIs; they are URI references. > And if you use that URI to name your namespace that is perfectly valid. > Your just saying that the namespace is named by something that > also identfies your mailbox. No problems there... A name doesn't > get to define how or why it gets used, just what it names and how long > you get to trust that. (plus I would claim that using an email > address as a namespace name violates the persistence requirement > that the Rec puts on those names). One of my email addresses has been around longer than 99% of the .com names on the Internet. Why do you think it is not persistent? -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Friday, 2 June 2000 18:13:55 UTC