- From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 18:04:13 +0100 (BST)
- To: abrahams@acm.org
- CC: xml-uri@w3.org
> sense that the namespace spec and the W3-specified namespace names give not > the slightest hint that such variants of URI were ever contemplated. ??????? I (and most other people) read the namespace spec as saying any URI reference is allowed as a namespace name. How would you define "expected" names? David
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2000 13:14:04 UTC