- From: Frystyk <frystyk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 15:42:04 -0700
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, David Turner <dturner@microsoft.com>
- Cc: XML-uri@w3.org, Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
> In particular, I'm not sure if/how it impacts the > namespace-uri() function of XPath. It shouldn't - xpath requires the URI to be expanded. This proposal says that you might not have to expand - it depends on the context you are in and what you use the URIs for. > Would you please take a look at the test case in > > the case of two bats Dan Connolly (Tue, May 16 2000) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/2000May/0137.html > > and tell me whether "the stylesheet should produce > > abs-com: http://example.com/2000/vocab# > > for the first document and > > abs-net: http://example.net/2000/vocab# > > for the second one"? They are clearly not the same - the two starting documents have different contexts and relative links should therefore not be evaluated without taking their different contexts into account. This was the reason for the requirement stated in the proposal: > > * No two namespace names will appear to be equal > > when more information would reveal them as unequal Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, mailto:frystyk@microsoft.com
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2000 18:42:54 UTC