- From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 01:21:28 +0100 (BST)
- To: connolly@w3.org
- CC: xml-uri@w3.org
> You just put a schema for XHTML at http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml ,
which one?
> put a schema for MathML at
> http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML
No thanks.
However thanks for this
> In case your question is about some detail of how this works,
> I mocked it up at:
I'll look in the morning ('tis rather late to look now).
> (one that integrates MathML
> into XHTML by saying, e.g. that <mathml> can be used as
> an HTML block element),
> This seems straightforward; am I misunderstanding your question?
XHTML Basic? XHTML 1.1? There was a reason for that previous massive
row over "three namespaces for html" to allow multiple schema for the
html namespace.
XHTML currently goes to some lengths to specify via a DTD DOCTYPE
declaration exactly which flavour of XHTML is being used (likely to be
even more important with xhtml modularisation) are you really saying
you think they should throw all that out and just have some generic
catch all `html' schema?
David
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 20:22:31 UTC