- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 10:54:17 -0500
- To: <xml-uri@w3.org>
At 10:03 2000 06 06 -0400, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: >From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net> >> There also exists a red/green problem with absolutization. It depends on >>whether a parser implements XBase. A document which is parsed using an XBase >>conformant parser might not be well formed (red XML), while the same >>document parsed with a current parser will be well formed (green XML). > >I agree that that is a huge problem with XBase. (Ha anyone made that >comment formally?) I fail to understand this. Please provide an example of a document that, when parsed using an XML Base conformant parser, is not well-formed, whereas when parsed with an XML Base unaware parser is well-formed *under the same assumption of how relative namespace names work*. I do not believe this to be the case. Whatever we decide to do with relative namespace names and whatever we decide about whether XML Base affects relative namespace names, given a decision, I do not see how awareness or lack thereof of XML Base can affect well-formedness. paul
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2000 11:54:21 UTC