Re: URIs quack like a duck

Tim Berners-Lee scripsit:

> Therefore, your home page is a namespace.

Wow.  Now I begin to understand where you are coming from.  You actually
do believe, then, that a namespace can *be* a document.  But if so,
why can't a namespace *be* an Internet mailbox?  (Since the Namespace
Rec tolerates either).  Presumably because you can't fetch an entity
body for a mailbox.

Me, I see a namespace as belonging to an entirely different ontological
class from a document.  I no more identify a namespace with a document
than I identify a document with a brick.

I suppose you would counter that accessing http://www.w3.org doesn't retrieve
a document per se, but only a representation of a document....

It seems that the longer we talk, the deeper the divisions that surface.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
	Yes, I know the message date is bogus.  I can't help it.
		--me, on far too many occasions

Received on Saturday, 3 June 2000 15:56:05 UTC