- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 01:22:19 -0400
- To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, "Larry Masinter" <masinter@attlabs.att.com>, <xml-uri@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> To: Larry Masinter <masinter@attlabs.att.com>; xml-uri@w3.org <xml-uri@w3.org> Date: Friday, June 02, 2000 12:30 PM Subject: Re: namespaces include their name => 1-1 >Larry Masinter wrote: > >> Namespaces aren't just any old resource. One of the properties of >> namespaces is that the definition of a namespace includes its namespace >> name. This means that there are many URIs that are *inappropriate* >> for use as namespace names, because they don't actually match the >> namespace name given in the namespace definition. That works with schemas too as they have a way of saying "this schema defines ....". But you have given Clark his injective function. John wrote, as what seemed a non sequitur, but never mind: >Only on the assumption (for which there seems to be absolutely no >warrant) that just because the namespace name has the syntax of a >URI reference, the URI of the namespace is necessarily that same >URI reference or an absolutized (RFC-2396-resolved) version of it. Fortunately I do not have to make the assumption (for which there seems to be absolutely no warrant) that just because your email had a string of characters which happened to match the syntax of that sentence that you don't actually necessrily mean anything of the sort. Otherwise I would be worried...
Received on Saturday, 3 June 2000 01:20:58 UTC