RE: essential test cases?

Dan Conolly wrote:
> 	If anybody doesn't think that the two bats should be treated
> 	as distinct by XSLT implementations, please speak up.

How about the XSLT examples given by David? See...

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/2000Jun/0461.html

I agree that XSLT currently is specified to treat them differently, but
obviously none of the current XSLT implementations treat them this way. For
me this indicates that the XPath spec needs to be reconsidered.


Julian

Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 15:36:27 UTC