- From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 16:50:43 +0100 (BST)
- To: michaelm@netsol.com
- CC: xml-uri@w3.org
> Then how do you reconcile relative URIs with that requirement? They are allowed but give you a namespace name which isn't globally unique as do several absolute URI data:,david mailto:david file:///dev/null If the creator of the namespace desides he can live with this lack of uniqueness then so be it. (but I wouldn't object to the namespace rec using stronger language to discourage the practice) This lack of uniqueness is no reason at all to change the namespace spec so completely that it creates some kind of new unstable XML file that can be valid as it stands but if you use cat to send the contents to standard out, the result isn't even namespace conformant. David
Received on Thursday, 1 June 2000 11:46:00 UTC