- From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 10:34:21 -0400
- To: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@informatix.co.uk>
- Cc: xml-uri@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:01:39PM +0100, John Aldridge wrote: > At 16:30 03/06/00 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote: > >On Sat, 3 Jun 100, John Cowan wrote: > > > Tim Berners-Lee scripsit: > > > > > > > It also prevents the namespace URI being usefully dereferenced, > > > > as dereferencing it will get only the namespace name, and never any other > > > > information about the namespace. > > > > > > Granted, but since there is no guarantee what you might get > > > (an XML Schema? an RDF Schema? XLinks to various things? Human-readable > > > HTML? Nothing at all?), this seems less than useful. If you want > > > to know things about a namespace, discover some RDF that tells > > > you about it. > > > >I think 'less than useful' is a little unfair here, though RDF would be > >one of my favourite things to find when dereferencing... > > : > > >The thing that hangs together this (typically > >weblike) heterogeneity is that whatever we find when we dereference > >some namespace is authoritative. Whether I find HTML, MP3, a public key > >(hmmm...) or XML/RDF when I dereference a namespace URI, I > >should be able to treat that data as coming from the owner/manager of that > >Web vocabulary, and therefore something that can tell me something of the > >meaning of that vocabulary. > > This works fine if... > > (a) Only the creator of the namespace (i.e. the person with the ability to > place things at the namespace URI) should be able to make descriptive > statements about the namespace. That creator is the only one allowed to make authoritative assertions. I can make assertions about anything I want. It doesn't mean anyone listens to me.... > (b) A single formulation of that descriptive metadata is appropriate to > support all the various processing applications which the world will apply > to documents using names from the namespace. You don't need that. You use content negotiation in all of its forms to evolve the expresability over time. The metadata used to describe a namespace can have many representations. Whoever is doing the resolution is given the freedom to request which representation they need for their particualar application... -MM -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Mealling | Vote Libertarian! | www.rwhois.net/michael Sr. Research Engineer | www.ga.lp.org/gwinnett | ICQ#: 14198821 Network Solutions | www.lp.org | michaelm@netsol.com
Received on Monday, 5 June 2000 10:45:35 UTC