- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:44:00 -0400
- To: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>, <xml-uri@w3.org>
At 11:15 AM 6/25/00 -0400, Michael Champion wrote: >So, this proposal is: > - the original intent of most of the Namespace WG (right?) > - acceptable to those who believe that namespaces must be "real" URIs (?) > - consistent with existing XSLT practice (if not the letter of the spec) > - consistent with the DOM Level 2 CR I'm not completely settled down to liking this proposal, but I'm very happy with this exchange: >Q: OK, then, what's the namespace name of the root element? >A: ../foo , per the namespaces spec as written. > > But be careful about calling it anything else, > like "namespace URI" -- that terminology suggests > that you're talking about the absolute form > of ../foo w.r.t. the relevant base. Establishing a strong separation between 'namespace names' (roughly, literal) and 'namespace URIs' (roughly, absolutize) and then determining the relationship between them seems like a good way to move forward. That way, those of us who are only concerned with namespace names can get our work done, while those more excited about namespace URIs can also get their work done. It doesn't seem like supporting both those views of a document should be that difficult, given the information (base URIs) already provided by the Infoset. >As Dan C. says, "this is the best we can do". Let's do it! It's a promising path, anyway. Laying out rules for namespace names - which should be very simple - and rules for namespace URIs - which will be more complex - will still take some work, but at least it seems feasible. (I'm not real happy with Dan's "absolutize for XML 2.0" suggestion, but moving forward with this separation might create an environment in which we can get some experience of how this really works. If we find absolutization is great in practice, then fine, if it proves unwieldy, then fine. I'd like to see practical experience with this issue fed into the 2.0 spec.) Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Received on Sunday, 25 June 2000 14:41:38 UTC