- From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 100 21:12:23 -0400 (EDT)
- To: cce@clarkevans.com (Clark C. Evans)
- Cc: xml-uri@w3.org
Clark C. Evans scripsit: > In the case that we stick with the current specification's > definition of the namespace *as* the URI string, and not > as a resource it refers to; then the function is not > required, and hence, the injective debate is moot. Actually, it says that the *name* of the namespace (one of its properties) is a URI reference string. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org Yes, I know the message date is bogus. I can't help it. --me, on far too many occasions
Received on Thursday, 1 June 2000 20:46:53 UTC