- From: Julian Reschke <reschke@muenster.de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:17:08 +0200
- To: <abrahams@acm.org>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: <xml-uri@w3.org>
Paul W. Abrahams wrote: > Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > > > - a namesapce is identified by a URI. (That is, if any resource is > > identified by URI u, and a namespace is identified by URI u, then that > > resource *is* that namespace) > > To pursue the question of what you mean by that: are all URIs > equally suitable > for that purpose, assuming only that the URI is chosen so that one can be > reasonably confident of its uniqueness? If not, how would you > distinguish the > suitable URIs from the unsuitable ones? There certainly does not > seem to be > any agreement as to what if anything should be at the resource > identified by > the URI, if indeed such a resource exists at all. To pursue this even further: 1) The XSLT namespace name is an URI ref that currently points to an HTML document "describing" the XSLT namespace, 2) According to Tim, the HTLM documentation thus *is* the namespace, 3) Given an RDF document referring to that URI, does it make statements about a namespace, a language or an HTML document??? 4) If all of them are *the same thing*, what happens if the HTML document is replaced by an XML schema document? (I think this happened recently @ the namespace RECs own URI). Julian
Received on Monday, 19 June 2000 18:17:16 UTC