- From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 17:03:48 +0100 (BST)
- To: jcowan@reutershealth.com
- CC: xml-uri@w3.org
> What Microsoft claims, and has claimed, is that their *tools* yes I know, but could someone from MS clarify if in fact their tools only produce x-schema:#foo uris which are not relative to the letter of the law, even if they are in spirit? Also I would be the last one to argue that the specifics of a microsoft implementation should really determine the case. Breaking a recommendation is bad in principle, even if it's only me that ever made documents that will get broken. But in this case the truth of the matter about these tools may mean the difference between a few hundred documents being broken and a few million and as a practical matter of breaking the stalemate this may be an important consideration. David
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2000 12:01:54 UTC