- From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 19:41:22 +0100 (BST)
- To: asgilman@iamdigex.net
- CC: xml-uri@w3.org
> I also submit that there is actual practice (David Carlisle's examples) > where there is no intention of attaching any significance to a namespace. that example didn't have _no_ significance. the essential feature required was that it be a namespace other than the default and other than the XSL namespace. > Here the specification bug is that the ns-attr > is a required attribute, I don't understand this. In what sense is it required? David
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2000 14:50:18 UTC