- From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:03:07 -0700
- To: "'David G. Durand'" <david@dynamicDiagrams.com>
- Cc: XML-uri@w3.org
Thank you for your reply. Indeed, the namespaces specification can be read to support the idea that unambiguous comparison of names is a goal. But it is a large jump to read from this that it is "the _essential_" goal, or even that having this goal necessitates any particular mechanism of performing the comparison. What is made clear by the lengthy discussion on namespaces and URIs is that a certain aspect of the specification, namely context-dependent URIs, is in conflict with another apparently desirable goal, namely cheap character-based comparison, and this has raised the issue of whether two contextually-dependent namespace names from different contexts are necessarily the same if their characters are the same. That is, we are debating whether it is proper that "URI references which identify namespaces are considered identical when they are exactly the same character-for-character." It is invalid for you to have cited this passage as evidence in support of itself.
Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2000 19:04:22 UTC