- From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:23:06 -0400 (EDT)
- To: keshlam@us.ibm.com
- cc: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>, xml-uri@w3.org
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000 keshlam@us.ibm.com wrote: > I'd agree if Forbid was actually acceptable to everyone. There was some > evidence that it wasn't. The evidence is this: certain Microsoft tools generate namespaces in the form of relative URI references: an unknown number of Microsoft customers have created an unknown number of documents using these tools. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org "You need a change: try Canada" "You need a change: try China" --fortune cookies opened by a couple that I know
Received on Friday, 9 June 2000 15:00:18 UTC