- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 16:49:46 -0400
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > Sorry! A namespace *is* a language. I think it would be less confusing if you adopted the statement "A namespace is a vocabulary", since saying it is a language connotes that it has a single syntax, and namespaces (vocabularies) may have more than one syntax. For example, there are three well-known syntaxes for the XHTML 1.0 vocabulary. > Nor do I, because you don't *FIND* a resource by dereferencing a URI. > A resource is abstract and what you get back is a bag of bits - ... plus a media type. > not the resource but some (possible poor) representation of it. [snip] > A namesapce name is a URI. A great big solid URI. > No more. Just a URI. Once you have made a URI > you can't stop it from being used to hang things on. And here we have the original debate reappearing: is a namespace name a URI, or a string with the syntax of a URI reference? The Namespace Rec says the latter, the Director says the former. Who's gonna win? -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2000 16:50:09 UTC