- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 13:58:24 -0400
- To: xml-uri@w3.org
At 10:39 AM 6/2/00 -0700, Sam Hunting wrote: >> It is, however, permitted by the XML 1.0 spec, at least in its >> current incarnation. > >Presumably, since it would be "immoral" (in John Cowan's useful >formulation) to break existing documents, no future incarnation of XML >will require namespace qualified names? I'm not sure that will actually be such a problem, because having no namespace is legitimate in the world described by Namespaces in XML, and because the version number would likely change were such a drastic move to be made. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth http://www.simonstl.com
Received on Friday, 2 June 2000 13:56:16 UTC