- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:05:04 -0400
- To: keshlam@us.ibm.com, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
keshlam@us.ibm.com wrote: > > >The Infoset WD says that documents that aren't NS-compliant don't have > infosets. > > Thank you, Sir John of Cowan. So if we declare that relative NS > declarations are forbidden by the Namespace spec, that introduces no new > special cases or conflicts. Right. The latest (internal) draft of the Infoset WD has no problem as written with "forbid" or "literal", and simply needs a new property for namespace information items if "absolute" is chosen, namely "resolved URI". -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Friday, 23 June 2000 16:05:31 UTC