Saturday, 31 March 2012
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
Friday, 30 March 2012
- [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: Delay in File * spec publications in /TR/ [Was: CfC: publish LCWD of File API; deadline March 3]
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Delay in File * spec publications in /TR/ [Was: CfC: publish LCWD of File API; deadline March 3]
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
Thursday, 29 March 2012
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- [Bug 16557] New: Figure out bytes to code point mapping for statusText
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: Feedback requested for UndoManager and DOM Transaction
- [Bug 8406] Stricter Specifications on Mouse Events Specifically primary, auxillary, and secondary default actions
Tuesday, 27 March 2012
- File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- Re: HELP
- [xhr] statusText is underdefined
- HELP
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline April 3
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Web Workers; deadline April 3
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Web Workers; deadline April 3
- [Bug 16534] give me a demo on php pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: StreamBuilder threshold
- Re: Where should UA insert text when the focus is changed in a keypress event handler?
- [Bug 16534] New: give me a demo on php pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Monday, 26 March 2012
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- [Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: [IndexedDB] Synchronous access to object stores
- informal survey - on spec philosophy
- [Bug 16297] combining multiple author request headers
- [Bug 16299] editorial - inadequate description of upload attribute
- [Bug 16310] editorial - sub-dividing 4.7.7 infrastructure for the send() method
- [Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
- [Bug 16301] editorial - ambiguous language
- Re: [Bug 15400] New: WebSocket Protocol reference needs updating
- [Bug 16299] editorial - inadequate description of upload attribute
- [Bug 16298] editorial - inadequate description of timeout attribute
- [Bug 16296] editorial - possible improved language
- [Bug 16293] missing definition - resolve url
- [Bug 16291] editorial - s/higher than/greater than/g
- [Bug 16290] missing definition - globally unique identifier
- [Bug 16289] inconsistent initial state
- [Bug 16288] editorial - change "metadata" to "internal state"
- [Bug 16287] editorial - ambiguous antecedent of 'their values'
- Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM4; deadine April 2
- Re: [Bug 15400] New: WebSocket Protocol reference needs updating
- CfC: publish WD of DOM4; deadine April 2
- [IndexedDB] Synchronous access to object stores
- [Bug 14404] Version of an IDBDatabase from an aborted version change transaction needs to be specified
- Re: CfC: test suite for Web Storage CR; deadline April 11
- [Bug 16501] IndexedDB: IDBObjectStore/IDBIndex.keyPath when key path is an Array?
Sunday, 25 March 2012
Saturday, 24 March 2012
- [Bug 16502] New: Define multiple monitor support and per-subdomain
- [Bug 16103] Remove DOMStringList usage
Friday, 23 March 2012
Thursday, 22 March 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] ReSpec.js changes appears to have broken the IndexedDB spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] ReSpec.js changes appears to have broken the IndexedDB spec
- RfC: LCWD of Widget Updates; deadline April 19
- Re: [IndexedDB] ReSpec.js changes appears to have broken the IndexedDB spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] ReSpec.js changes appears to have broken the IndexedDB spec
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
- [Bug 13843] Define Range mutation for normalize()
- [IndexedDB] ReSpec.js changes appears to have broken the IndexedDB spec
- [Bug 16469] storage event for clear() is defined to have |key| set to null, but |key| is not nullable
- [Bug 16467] New: [IndexedDB] [editorial] remove spurious IDBVersionChangeRequest-sentence
- [Bug 16465] New: [IndexedDB] Error handling of db.transaction('mystore', 'some invalid value here') should be defined
- CfC: test suite for Web Storage CR; deadline April 4
- [Bug 16464] display:none/visibility:hidden
- [Bug 16464] New: display:none/visibility:hidden
- [Bug 16461] what this is importent to me?
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26
- Re: Element.matchesSelector vs. Element. matches
- Element.matchesSelector vs. Element. matches
- [Bug 16461] New: what this is importent to me?
- [Bug 8406] Stricter Specifications on Mouse Events Specifically primary, auxillary, and secondary default actions
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] onsuccess isn’t the best for writes
- Re: Recent Sync XHR changes and impact on automatically translated JavaScript code
- Re: Recent Sync XHR changes and impact on automatically translated JavaScript code
- Re: Where should UA insert text when the focus is changed in a keypress event handler?
- Re: Where should UA insert text when the focus is changed in a keypress event handler?
- Re: Recent Sync XHR changes and impact on automatically translated JavaScript code
- Re: Recent Sync XHR changes and impact on automatically translated JavaScript code
- Where should UA insert text when the focus is changed in a keypress event handler?
- Re: Recent Sync XHR changes and impact on automatically translated JavaScript code
- Re: Recent Sync XHR changes and impact on automatically translated JavaScript code
- Re: [webcomponents] Progress Update
- Re: Recent Sync XHR changes and impact on automatically translated JavaScript code
- Recent Sync XHR changes and impact on automatically translated JavaScript code
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26
- [Bug 16451] New: Clarify the order of the documents
- [Bug 16449] New: requestFullScreen() terminates at the wrong place
- Re: [webcomponents] Progress Update
- Re: [webcomponents] Progress Update
- Re: [webcomponents] Progress Update
- Re: [webcomponents] Progress Update
- Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API
- Re: [IndexedDB] onsuccess isn’t the best for writes
- Re: [IndexedDB] onsuccess isn’t the best for writes
- Re: [DOM4] Question about using sequence<T> v.s., NodeList for
- Re: [IndexedDB] onsuccess isn’t the best for writes
Monday, 19 March 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] onsuccess isn’t the best for writes
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- Re: [IndexedDB] onsuccess isn’t the best for writes
- [Bug 16441] New: Spec should note that onsuccess shouldn’t be used for writes.
- [webcomponents] Progress Update
- Re: [IndexedDB] onsuccess isn’t the best for writes
- Call for Review: Web Audio API
- Re: Regarding app notification and wake up
- RE: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26
- CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26
Friday, 16 March 2012
Monday, 19 March 2012
Sunday, 18 March 2012
Thursday, 15 March 2012
Saturday, 17 March 2012
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] Question about using sequence<T> v.s., NodeList for
Friday, 16 March 2012
- Re: [DOM4] Question about using sequence<T> v.s., NodeList for
- Re: [DOM4] Question about using sequence<T> v.s., NodeList for
- [DOM4] Question about using sequence<T> v.s., NodeList for (was [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated )
Thursday, 15 March 2012
- [Bug 16387] http://www.mylifetime.com/self-improvement/user-video-sally-hewens-2008.12.10.11.25.45Remove this was posted by Ray Fullerton an evil person and I want it removed at once
- [Bug 16388] http://www.mylifetime.com/self-improvement/user-video-sally-hewens-2008.12.10.11.25.45Remove this was posted by Ray Fullerton an evil person and I want it removed at once
- [Bug 16388] New: http://www.mylifetime.com/self-improvement/user-video-sally-hewens-2008.12.10.11.25.45Remove this was posted by Ray Fullerton an evil person and I want it removed at once
- [Bug 16387] New: http://www.mylifetime.com/self-improvement/user-video-sally-hewens-2008.12.10.11.25.45Remove this was posted by Ray Fullerton an evil person and I want it removed at once
- Call for Agenda Topics: May 1-2 f2f meeting; Registration deadline April 16
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
- RfC: LCWD of WebPerf WG's High Resolution Time; deadline April 10
- RfC: LCWD of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline April 3
- RfC: LCWD of Web Workers; deadline April 3
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- [Bug 16224] Change .readyState to use string values rather than numeric constants
- [Bug 16223] Change .readyState to use string values rather than numeric constants
- [Bug 15720] [IndexedDB] Specify key generation details
Monday, 12 March 2012
- [Bug 9557] Mouse Lock via Javascript
- RE: Regarding app notification and wake up
- Re: Regarding app notification and wake up
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: Regarding app notification and wake up
- Re: Regarding app notification and wake up
- CfC: publish LCWD of Widget Updates; deadline March 19
Sunday, 11 March 2012
- [Bug 16305] 'error' event defined but never fired
- [Bug 16306] 'timeout' event defined but never fired
- [Bug 16312] New: use of undocumented 'switch' convention for rule formulation is ambiguous
Saturday, 10 March 2012
- [Bug 16310] New: editorial - sub-dividing 4.7.7 infrastructure for the send() method
- [Bug 16309] New: meaning of "user interferes with the request"?
- [Bug 16306] 'timeout' event defined but never fired
- [Bug 16305] 'error' event defined but never fired
- [Bug 16307] you are fucking riddiculas (google the right spellings from google) okay so i was saying that your documentation is way too pathetic to read and understand ... note whatever shit you want to store for me, I am stating the truth!
- [Bug 16307] New: you are fucking riddiculas (google the right spellings from google) okay so i was saying that your documentation is way too pathetic to read and understand ... note whatever shit you want to store for me, I am stating the truth!
- [Bug 16306] 'timeout' event defined but never fired
- [Bug 16305] 'error' event defined but never fired
- [Bug 16306] New: 'timeout' event defined but never fired
- [Bug 16305] New: 'error' event defined but never fired
- [Bug 16304] New: DONE != DONE
- [Bug 16303] New: meaning of "all" charset parameters of content-type header
- [Bug 16302] New: possible unnecessary insertion of U+0020 SPACE in mime type expression
- [Bug 16301] New: editorial - ambiguous language
- [Bug 16299] New: editorial - inadequate description of update attribute
- RE: Regarding app notification and wake up
- RE: Regarding app notification and wake up
- [Bug 16298] New: editorial - inadequate description of timeout attribute
- RE: Regarding app notification and wake up
- [Bug 16297] New: combining multiple author request headers
- Re: Regarding app notification and wake up
Friday, 9 March 2012
- [Bug 16296] New: editorial - possible improved language
- [Bug 16295] New: clarify intention of early termination of abort/send
- [Bug 16293] New: missing definition - resolve url
- [Bug 16292] New: conflation of DOMString and deflated DOMString
- [Bug 16133] [IndexedDB] update createObjectStore examples to use optionalParameters
- [Bug 15813] TypeError shouldn't be referenced as a DOMException
- [Bug 14404] Version of an IDBDatabase from an aborted version change transaction needs to be specified
- [Bug 16291] New: editorial - s/higher than/greater than/g
- [Bug 16290] New: missing definition - globally unique identifier
- [Bug 16289] New: inconsistent initial state
- [Bug 16288] New: editorial - change "metadata" to "internal state"
- [Bug 16287] New: editorial - ambiguous antecedent of 'their values'
- RE: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward
- RE: Regarding app notification and wake up
- Re: Regarding Action-32
- Regarding Action-32
- Re: Regarding app notification and wake up
- Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward
- [Bug 16281] yt uyt iu tyu tyu
- [Bug 16281] New: yt uyt iu tyu tyu
- Regarding app notification and wake up
- Re: [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- [Bug 16103] Remove DOMStringList usage
- [Bug 9419] Web IDL
- [Bug 8758] Define DOMContentLoaded
Thursday, 8 March 2012
- [Bug 11358] Should addEventListener's last argument be optional?
- DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward
- [Bug 16103] Remove DOMStringList usage
- [Bug 16017] [IndexedDB] editorial changes
- [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
Wednesday, 7 March 2012
- RE: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- RE: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: CfC: publish WD of File API: Writer + File API: Directories and System; deadline March 3
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [CORS] Review of CORS and WebAppSec prior to LCWD
- [CORS] Review of CORS and WebAppSec prior to LCWD
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- [Bug 16108] [IndexedDB] (editorial) bound(), lowerBound() and upperBound() have open mixed
- [Bug 16233] Wrong description for lowerBound() and upperBound() methods
- [Bug 16211] Relax the ability to add a record if it doesn't meet the constraints of a predefined index
- [Bug 16205] IDBRequest returned by IDBFactory.deleteDatabase will be set to undefined
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- RE: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- RE: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- RE: FileReader abort, again
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [widgets] Request for a CFC about Widget URI and Updates
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: FileReader abort, again
- Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Review of CORS and WebAppSec prior to LCWD
- Review of CORS and WebAppSec prior to LCWD
- [Bug 16236] Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium Edition Service Pack 1 (build 7601), 64-bit Internet Explorer v. 9.0.8112.16421 FreeYouTubeToMP3Converter 3.10.14 VideoFileToIPOD.dll - Ok DVSiTunes.dll - Ok
- [Bug 16236] New: Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium Edition Service Pack 1 (build 7601), 64-bit Internet Explorer v. 9.0.8112.16421 FreeYouTubeToMP3Converter 3.10.14 VideoFileToIPOD.dll - Ok DVSiTunes.dll - Ok
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry and duplicate elements
- Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry and duplicate elements
- [Bug 16233] New: Wrong description for lowerBound() and upperBound() methods
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
Monday, 5 March 2012
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- RE: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- [webcomponents] Progress Update
- Re: FileReader abort, again
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- CfC: LCWD of Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS); deadline March 9
- RE: [IndexedDB] Multientry and duplicate elements
- RE: [IndexedDB] Multientry and duplicate elements
- [Bug 16207] Editing states such as style with css flag should be reset when the document is replaced
- [Bug 16206] Editing spec should clarify normative and non-normative sections
Sunday, 4 March 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry and duplicate elements
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry and duplicate elements
- [Bug 16224] New: Change .readyState to use string values rather than numeric constants
- [Bug 16223] New: Change .readyState to use string values rather than numeric constants
Saturday, 3 March 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
- Re: [fileapi] timing of readyState changes vs. events
- Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
- Re: [indexeddb] What should happen when specifying the wrong "mode" or "direction"?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
- [indexeddb] What should happen when specifying the wrong "mode" or "direction"?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
- Re: IndexedDB: What happens when versionchange transaction is aborted?
- RE: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
- [Bug 16211] New: Relax the ability to add a record if it doesn't meet the constraints of a predefined index
- [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal
- Re: Re: IndexedDB: What happens when versionchange transaction is aborted?
- Re: RE: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
Friday, 2 March 2012
- Re: [fileapi] timing of readyState changes vs. events
- Re: [fileapi] timing of readyState changes vs. events
- RE: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
- Re: IndexedDB: What happens when versionchange transaction is aborted?
- [Bug 16207] New: Editing states such as style with css flag should be reset when the document is replaced
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
- [Bug 16206] New: Editing spec should clarify normative and non-normative sections
- [Bug 16205] New: IDBRequest returned by IDBFactory.deleteDatabase will be set to undefined
- CfC: publish LCWD of Web Workers; deadline March 9
- RE: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
- RE: [IndexedDB] Multientry and duplicate elements
- CfC: publish LCWD of Web Messaging; deadline March 9
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- RE: IndexedDB: What happens when versionchange transaction is aborted?
- [Bug 15856] [IndexedDB] Remove empty string as a possible version
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry and duplicate elements
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
- [Bug 15717] Adding TransactionInactiveError to IDBObjectStore.count and IDBIndex.count
- [Bug 15864] [IndexedDB] Array as key, avoid array loops
- [Bug 16013] objectStoreNames order should be specified (alphabetic?)
- [Bug 15987] [IndexedDB] Invalid dates should not be valid keys
- [Bug 15796] Specify how to extract a key when keyPath is an array
- Re: IndexedDB: What happens when versionchange transaction is aborted?
- Re: CfC: publish Widget URI spec as a WG Note; deadline March 9
- CfC: publish Widget URI spec as a WG Note; deadline March 9
- Re: May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps; deadline March 4
- Re: [fileapi] timing of readyState changes vs. events
- [IndexedDB] Multientry and duplicate elements
- [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys
- [Bug 16137] IndexedDB: Add API for enumerating databases
- IndexedDB: What happens when versionchange transaction is aborted?
- IndexedDB: Finalizing error handling
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs
- Re: [fileapi] timing of readyState changes vs. events
Thursday, 1 March 2012
- Re: [fileapi] timing of readyState changes vs. events
- [Bug 16189] New: Add editing tests for WebKit bug 79448
- Re: FileReader abort, again
- May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
Thursday, 1 March 2012
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- RE: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- [Bug 16172] el shaddal dwxi 23 years celebations of faith love unity august 18::: 19 2007
- [Bug 16172] New: el shaddal dwxi 23 years celebations of faith love unity august 18::: 19 2007
- Re: [IndexedDB] Transactions during window.unload?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
- [fileapi] timing of readyState changes vs. events
- Re: FileReader abort, again
- Re: FileReader abort, again
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- Re: FileReader abort, again
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- Re: FileReader abort, again
- Re: FileReader abort, again
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- [Bug 15721] [IndexedDB] Specify when calling transaction() should throw due to being called "too early"
- [Bug 15434] [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: [xhr] remove readystatechange event fired while invoking async send()?
- Re: IME API Use cases editorial feedback
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: IME API Use cases editorial feedback
- Re: RE: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]
- IME API Use cases editorial feedback
- Re: RE: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- [Bug 16157] New: WebSocket shouldn't throw SyntaxError on unpaired surrogates
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- RE: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- FileReader abort, again
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
Tuesday, 28 February 2012
- Re: [file-writer] WebIDL / References
- Re: FileSystem API: Adding file size field to Metadata?
- Re: FileSystem API: Adding file size field to Metadata?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]
- FileSystem API: Adding file size field to Metadata?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- [widgets] Request for a CFC about Widget URI and Updates
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- WebSocket-enabled Jetty 7.6 now on w3c-test.org
- [Bug 16146] mportant than the solution, in fact.
- [Bug 16146] New: mportant than the solution, in fact.
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]
- Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]
- RE: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
Monday, 27 February 2012
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- Re: [FileAPI, common] UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: CfC: publish WD of File API: Writer + File API: Directories and System; deadline March 3
- [Bug 16137] New: IndexedDB: Add API for enumerating databases
- Re: CfC: publish WD of File API: Writer + File API: Directories and System; deadline March 3
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [file-writer] WebIDL / References
- [Bug 16134] New: This spec should point out how to actually receive data. Afaik you need to access the message event's data property, but the spec doesn't mention that anywhere.
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- [Bug 16133] New: [IndexedDB] update createObjectStore examples to use optionalParameters
- [Bug 16132] fd gds fd d dds d sdg sdfg
- [Bug 16132] New: fd gds fd d dds d sdg sdfg
- Re: Bug in http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI
- Bug in http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI
- Re: CfC: publish WD of File API: Writer + File API: Directories and System; deadline March 3
Saturday, 25 February 2012
- [file-writer] WebIDL / References
- CfC: publish WD of File API: Writer + File API: Directories and System; deadline March 3
- CfC: publish LCWD of File API; deadline March 3
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
Friday, 24 February 2012
- RE: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- [Bug 15527] Allow div (and maybe br) as a paragraph separator
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- [Bug 13118] Fire the input event for contenteditable areas as well
- [Bug 16094] Editing commands should do nothing if the selection isn't fully contained in a single editing host
- [Bug 10234] Unused argument in example function prepareDatabase()
- [Bug 7720] Redundant definition of openDatabase methods
- [Bug 16108] New: [IndexedDB] (editorial) bound(), lowerBound() and upperBound() have open mixed
- [Bug 13891] Allow author scripts that fire before or after every command
- Re: [webapps-component] Web and Canvas Components, select, audio controls and ARIA
- [Bug 16103] New: Remove DOMStringList usage
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBDAtabase.transaction clarification
- [webapps-component] Web and Canvas Components, select, audio controls and ARIA
- Re: Disallowing mutation events in shadow DOM
- Re: Disallowing mutation events in shadow DOM
- Re: Disallowing mutation events in shadow DOM
- Re: Disallowing mutation events in shadow DOM
Thursday, 23 February 2012
- Re: Disallowing mutation events in shadow DOM
- Re: Disallowing mutation events in shadow DOM
- Disallowing mutation events in shadow DOM
- RE: [IndexedDB] Transactions during window.unload?
- [Bug 16095] New: Element with contenteditable=true shouldn't be considered as an editing host if it's already in an editable region
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBDAtabase.transaction clarification
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBDAtabase.transaction clarification
- [Bug 16094] New: Do not allow editing commands to affect editing hosts that aren't near the selection
- [IndexedDB] IDBDAtabase.transaction clarification
- Re: [DOM4] EventTarget as first class citizen
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [DOM4] Constructor for DOMException?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- [DOM4] EventTarget as first class citizen
- Re: StreamBuilder threshold
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- [xhr] remove readystatechange event fired while invoking async send()?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
Wednesday, 22 February 2012
- RE: StreamBuilder threshold
- Re: [DOM4] Constructor for DOMException?
- [Bug 14408] [IndexedDB] Cursors .key/.primaryKey/.value shouldn't throw as soon as .continue is called
- Re: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [DOM4] Constructor for DOMException?
- Re: [DOM4] Constructor for DOMException?
- [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- [testsuites] WebSocket support on w3c-test.org
- [Bug 16070] New: uses MessageEvent but doesn't define or reference external definition
Tuesday, 21 February 2012
- Re: [DOM4] Constructor for DOMException?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Transactions during window.unload?
- [IndexedDB] Transactions during window.unload?
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- RfC: Timing control for script-based animations Last Call; deadline March 20
- Re: [webcomponents]: Progress updates
- [DOM4] Constructor for DOMException?
Monday, 20 February 2012
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- Re: Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: February 2012 updates
- Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: February 2012 updates
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
Sunday, 19 February 2012
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- Re: Encoding Spec and Encoding for readAsText
Saturday, 18 February 2012
- Re: Encoding Spec and Encoding for readAsText
- Re: [FileAPI] Various comments
- [Bug 15998] confusion between method name URL.revokeObjectURL and URL.revokeBlobURL
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- [Bug 16025] New: Re: Web Storage Editor's Draft 28 November 2011 "The use of the storage mutex to avoid race conditions is currently considered by certain implementors to be too high a performance burden, to the point where allowing data corruption is considered preferabl
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- Re: (aside) MIME type
- Re: (aside) MIME type (was> Re: Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard)
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
Friday, 17 February 2012
- (aside) MIME type (was> Re: Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard)
- [Bug 15509] Define HTTP handling of data URLs (and maybe other URLs)
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- [webcomponents]: Progress updates
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- Re: [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- [Bug 16017] New: [IndexedDB] editorial changes
- [Clipboard] checking if implementation allows reading/writing a given type to the OS clipboard
- [Bug 16013] New: objectStoreNames order should be specified (alphabetic?)
- Re: Installing Web Apps
- [Bug 16010] It's great that you post all this stuff up here... but perhaps writing it in proper English, rather than techobabble, would be a good idea. One example of this is: "When the setItem(), removeItem(), and clear() methods are called on a Storage object x tha
- [Bug 16010] New: It's great that you post all this stuff up here... but perhaps writing it in proper English, rather than techobabble, would be a good idea. One example of this is: "When the setItem(), removeItem(), and clear() methods are called on a Storage object x tha
Thursday, 16 February 2012
- [css3-ui] 'ime-mode' feedback
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- [Bug 16000] New: Trailers
- Re: [XHR] upload progress events ("successfully uploaded")
- Re: CfC: Proposal to add web packaging / asset compression
- Re: data and blob URLs in HTTP context
- [Bug 15998] New: confution between method name URL.revokeObjectURL and URL.revokeBlobURL
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
Wednesday, 15 February 2012
- [Bug 14408] [IndexedDB] Cursors .key/.primaryKey/.value shouldn't throw as soon as .continue is called
- Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: data and blob URLs in HTTP context
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method
- Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: data and blob URLs in HTTP context
- Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method
- Re: data and blob URLs in HTTP context
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: data and blob URLs in HTTP context
- Re: data and blob URLs in HTTP context
- Re: CfC: Proposal to add web packaging / asset compression
- Re: CfC: Proposal to add web packaging / asset compression
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Revisiting Command Elements and Toolbars
Tuesday, 14 February 2012
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Elements and Blob
- Re: Elements and Blob
- Elements and Blob
- Re: CfC: Proposal to add web packaging / asset compression
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- [Bug 15987] New: [IndexedDB] Invalid dates should not be valid keys
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: CfC: Proposal to add web packaging / asset compression
- Re: CfC: Proposal to add web packaging / asset compression
- Re: CfC: Proposal to add web packaging / asset compression
- Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method
- [Bug 15927] [IndexedDB] Allowing "." and " " in keys specified using keyPath
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: CfC: Proposal to add web packaging / asset compression
- CfC: Proposal to add web packaging / asset compression
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
Monday, 13 February 2012
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Templates 2: The Real World
- Re: Encoding Spec and Encoding for readAsText
- [Bug 15973] For WSS, there should be no masking from client to server. Masking is only necessary for WS client to server.
- [Bug 15973] New: For WSS, there should be no masking from client to server. Masking is only necessary for WS client to server.
Sunday, 12 February 2012
- [Bug 14200] Provide a hook to serialize a Document
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
Saturday, 11 February 2012
- IME API work...
- [Bug 15956] Mistype: HTTP 305 Use Proxy, HTTP 401 Unauthorized, and 407 Proxy Authentication Required should be treated transparently as for any other subresource. Should be: HTTP 305 Use Proxy, HTTP 401 Unauthorized, and HTTP 407 Proxy Authentication Required should
- [Bug 15956] New: Mistype: HTTP 305 Use Proxy, HTTP 401 Unauthorized, and 407 Proxy Authentication Required should be treated transparently as for any other subresource. Should be: HTTP 305 Use Proxy, HTTP 401 Unauthorized, and HTTP 407 Proxy Authentication Required should
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
Friday, 10 February 2012
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- [FileAPI] Various comments
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- [FileAPI] RfC of pre-LC version; deadline Feb 24
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?
- Re: Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
Thursday, 9 February 2012
Friday, 10 February 2012
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
Thursday, 9 February 2012
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: Templates 2: The Real World
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- connection ceremony for iframe postMessage communications
- Re: xframe or iframe type='cross-domain'
- Re: xframe or iframe type='cross-domain'
- Re: xframe or iframe type='cross-domain'
- Re: xframe or iframe type='cross-domain'
- xframe or iframe type='cross-domain'
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Templates 2: The Real World
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: CfC by 02-14: Add IME API to the charter
- Re: [clipboard] Event definition
- Re: [clipboard] Event definition
- Re: [Clipboard] Processing model feedback (and other)
- [clipboard] Event definition
- Re: Installing web apps
- CfC: publish WD of Clipboard API and events; deadline February 16
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
Wednesday, 8 February 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] Considering declarative event handlers
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
Wednesday, 8 February 2012
- [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: CfC by 02-14: Add IME API to the charter
- Re: CfC by 02-14: Add IME API to the charter
- Re: CfC by 02-14: Add IME API to the charter
- Re: CfC by 02-14: Add IME API to the charter
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: Installing web apps
- CfC by 02-14: Add IME API to the charter
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?
- Re: Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?
- Re: Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?
- Re: Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?
- Re: Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?
- Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?
- Re: Overhauling Pointer Lock (was Mouse Lock) to FullScreen API pattern
- Re: Overhauling Pointer Lock (was Mouse Lock) to FullScreen API pattern
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for WebApps
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for WebApps
- Re: Installing web apps
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: [webcomponents] Considering declarative event handlers
- Re: [webcomponents] Considering declarative event handlers
- Re: [webcomponents] Considering declarative event handlers
- Re: [webcomponents] Considering declarative event handlers
- Re: [webcomponents] Considering declarative event handlers
- Re: [webcomponents] Considering declarative event handlers
- Re: [webcomponents] Considering declarative event handlers
- [webcomponents] Considering declarative event handlers
- Re: Overhauling Pointer Lock (was Mouse Lock) to FullScreen API pattern
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for WebApps
- Re: Installing web apps
- [Bug 15927] New: [IndexedDB] Allowing "." and " " in keys specified using keyPath
- Re: Installing web apps
- Back to XHR errors (was Re: Installing web apps)
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for WebApps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for WebApps
- Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21
- [Bug 13700] W3C SotD of this document still mentions whatwg.org version of the WebSocket protocol which is out of date.
- CSS Device Adaption and Fullscreen
Monday, 6 February 2012
- April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- [Bug 15917] prueba de uso de web broker
- [Bug 15917] New: prueba de uso de web broker
- Re: [XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects
- Re: Encoding Spec and Encoding for readAsText
- [Bug 15916] New: DOMParser Document origin
- [Bug 15901] Create "Participate:" box at top of the specification
- Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: Charter clarification: common manifest
- Re: [FileAPI] No streaming semantics?
- [FileAPI] No streaming semantics?
Sunday, 5 February 2012
- Re: data and blob URLs in HTTP context
- Re: [XHR] Invoking open() from event listeners
- data and blob URLs in HTTP context
- Re: StreamBuilder threshold
- [Bug 15902] New: DOMParser created documents should use about:blank as URL
- [Bug 15901] New: Create "Participate:" box at top of the specification
- Re: StreamBuilder threshold
- Re: Encoding Spec and Encoding for readAsText
- [Bug 15898] XTech 2000 (http://www.gca.org/attend/2000_conferences/xtech_2000/) is around the corner, and members of W3C team will be there, including Eric Prud'hommeaux, Michael Sperberg-McQueen, Henry Thompson, and Daniel Veillard. If you're going (or not), you may
- [Bug 15898] New: XTech 2000 (http://www.gca.org/attend/2000_conferences/xtech_2000/) is around the corner, and members of W3C team will be there, including Eric Prud'hommeaux, Michael Sperberg-McQueen, Henry Thompson, and Daniel Veillard. If you're going (or not), you may
- Re: [selectors4][css3-syntax] should document.querySelector("html /* ") throw? (and some editorial comments)
Saturday, 4 February 2012
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: [selectors4][css3-syntax] should document.querySelector("html /* ") throw? (and some editorial comments)
- Re: [selectors4][css3-syntax] should document.querySelector("html /* ") throw? (and some editorial comments)
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [selectors4][css3-syntax] should document.querySelector("html /* ") throw? (and some editorial comments)
- [selectors4][css3-syntax] should document.querySelector("html /* ") throw? (and some editorial comments)
Friday, 3 February 2012
- [Bug 15866] Support HTML parsing in DOMParser
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob protocol version - is this needed?
- [Bug 15872] dear sir/mam, i inform for some malfunction of your item furchasing to your item mall was not found in item bank.please take it action.thanks
- [Bug 15872] New: dear sir/mam, i inform for some malfunction of your item furchasing to your item mall was not found in item bank.please take it action.thanks
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- [Bug 15866] New: Support HTML parsing in DOMParser
- [Bug 15864] New: [IndexedDB] Array as key, avoid array loops
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Image.toBlob()
- Re: Image.toBlob()
- Re: Image.toBlob()
- Re: Image.toBlob()
- Re: Image.toBlob()
Thursday, 2 February 2012
- Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
- Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
- Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
- Re: Image.toBlob()
- Re: Image.toBlob()
- Re: Image.toBlob()
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
Wednesday, 1 February 2012
Thursday, 2 February 2012
- [Bug 15856] New: [IndexedDB] Remove empty string as a possible version
- RE: [FileAPI] Blob protocol version - is this needed?
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
Wednesday, 1 February 2012
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Granting permissions, was Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Granting permissions, was Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Re: Installing web apps
- Installing web apps
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- [Bug 15830] incorrect protocol spec ref
- [Bug 15830] New: incorrect protocol spec ref
- [Bug 15829] New: wrong bug tracker ref
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- Re: WebSocket API clise Method
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
Tuesday, 31 January 2012
- Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API
- [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM specification is now an Editor's Draft
- [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM specification is now an Editor's Draft
- Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
- Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
- [Bug 15813] New: TypeError shouldn't be referenced as a DOMException
- Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
- Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
- Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
- Re: autoincrement attribute on the object store
- CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API
- CG for Speech JavaScript API
- [Bug 15810] i m testing <><F>S<>D>DS>D<>S><DS>D<S>D<>SD<>D><>D>SD<><>DS<>D<D>S<D>SD<LDKKSDH JHDGSD GJDGJHDGSJ DJ <><F>S<>D>DS>D<>S><DS>D<S>D<>SD<>D><>D>SD<><>DS<>D<D>S<D>SD<LDKKSDH JHDGSD GJDGJHDGSJ DJ <><F>S<>D>DS>D<>S><DS>D<S>D<>SD<>D><>D>SD<><>DS<>D<D>S<D>SD<LDKKS
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- WebSocket API clise Method
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- [Bug 15810] New: i m testing <><F>S<>D>DS>D<>S><DS>D<S>D<>SD<>D><>D>SD<><>DS<>D<D>S<D>SD<LDKKSDH JHDGSD GJDGJHDGSJ DJ <><F>S<>D>DS>D<>S><DS>D<S>D<>SD<>D><>D>SD<><>DS<>D<D>S<D>SD<LDKKSDH JHDGSD GJDGJHDGSJ DJ <><F>S<>D>DS>D<>S><DS>D<S>D<>SD<>D><>D>SD<><>DS<>D<D>S<D>SD<LDKKS
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
Monday, 30 January 2012
- autoincrement attribute on the object store
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- [Bug 15796] New: Specify how to extract a key when keyPath is an array
- Re: Fwd: Data compression APIs?
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Fwd: Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Charter clarification: common manifest
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Fwd: Data compression APIs?
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- [Bug 15794] apa yang kamu lakukan terhadapku ?
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- [Bug 15794] apa yang kamu lakukan terhadapku ?
- [Bug 15794] New: apa yang kamu lakukan terhadapku ?
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: Charter clarification: common manifest
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock
- Charter clarification: common manifest
- Fwd: Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
Sunday, 29 January 2012
Saturday, 28 January 2012
- Re: CfC: publish new LCWD of Web IDL; deadline February 3
- Re: [xhr] responseType for sync requests in window context
- Re: [xhr] responseType for sync requests in window context
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Image.toBlob()
- Re: Image.toBlob()
- Image.toBlob()
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Overhauling Pointer Lock (was Mouse Lock) to FullScreen API pattern
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
Friday, 27 January 2012
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [xhr] responseType for sync requests in window context
- Re: [xhr] responseType for sync requests in window context
- Re: [xhr] responseType for sync requests in window context
- RE: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- RE: publish new LCWD of Web IDL; deadline February 3
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- RE: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- CfC: publish new LCWD of Web IDL; deadline February 3
- The Web, and security models Re: Reporting of CORS error in the XHR API callbacks
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
- Re: [File API] Draft for Review
Thursday, 26 January 2012
- Re: Web Forms 2 Repetition Model?please reinstate on specification
- [File API] Draft for Review
- RE: StreamBuilder threshold
- RE: [indexeddb] Creating transactions inside the oncomplete handler of a VERSION_CHANGE transaction
- Re: [indexeddb] Creating transactions inside the oncomplete handler of a VERSION_CHANGE transaction
- [Bug 15732] New: Specify that non-editable content shouldn't be focusable
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
- Re: [indexeddb] Creating transactions inside the oncomplete handler of a VERSION_CHANGE transaction
- RE: [indexeddb] Creating transactions inside the oncomplete handler of a VERSION_CHANGE transaction
- [Bug 15721] New: [IndexedDB] Specify when calling transaction() should throw due to being called "too early"
- [Bug 15720] New: [IndexedDB] Specify key generation details
- Re: [IndexedDB] Key generation details
- Re: [indexeddb] Creating transactions inside the oncomplete handler of a VERSION_CHANGE transaction
- [Bug 15719] New: Under section "Disk Space", there seems to be a word missing in the sentence (see part in parens): "User agents should guard against sites storing data (under the origins other affiliated sites)" Should it have said "under the origins _of_ other affiliate
Wednesday, 25 January 2012
- [Bug 15717] New: Adding TransactionInactiveError to IDBObjectStore.count and IDBIndex.count
- [indexeddb] Creating transactions inside the oncomplete handler of a VERSION_CHANGE transaction
- RE: [IndexedDB] Key generation details
- RE: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- [IndexedDB] Key generation details
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: [indexeddb] Missing TransactionInactiveError Exception type for count and index methods
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- RE: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
Tuesday, 24 January 2012
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
- Re: IndexedDB: Extra properties in optionalParameters objects
- Re: IndexedDB: Extra properties in optionalParameters objects
- RE: [indexeddb] Missing TransactionInactiveError Exception type for count and index methods
- IndexedDB: Extra properties in optionalParameters objects
- Re: [indexeddb] Missing TransactionInactiveError Exception type for count and index methods
- [Bug 15699] My phone does nt save when i download
- [Bug 15699] New: My phone does nt save when i download
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
- Re: [indexeddb] Missing TransactionInactiveError Exception type for count and index methods
- RE: [indexeddb] Missing TransactionInactiveError Exception type for count and index methods
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [indexeddb] Missing TransactionInactiveError Exception type for count and index methods
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- RE: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- RE: [indexeddb] Missing TransactionInactiveError Exception type for count and index methods
- RE: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- [Bug 14985] Specify how autoincrement + empty keypath works
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [indexeddb] Missing TransactionInactiveError Exception type for count and index methods
- [Bug 14404] Version of an IDBDatabase from an aborted version change transaction needs to be specified
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: [indexeddb] Missing TransactionInactiveError Exception type for count and index methods
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- [indexeddb] Missing TransactionInactiveError Exception type for count and index methods
Monday, 23 January 2012
- Re: Testing Expectations (was: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization)
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- RE: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again
Sunday, 22 January 2012
Friday, 20 January 2012
- RE: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- RE: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: Reporting of CORS error in the XHR API callbacks
- Re: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- RE: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
- Reporting of CORS error in the XHR API callbacks
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 24
Thursday, 19 January 2012
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
Wednesday, 18 January 2012
- RE: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- RE: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- RE: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- RfC: Draft of New Charter for the HyBi WG
- Re: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- RE: [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
Tuesday, 17 January 2012
- Re: [XHR] Invoking open() from event listeners
- RE: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- [Bug 15595] New: The abstract could be improved by pointing out that "WebSocket protocol" is defined by the IETF, while this API specifies the browser API to use that protocol. "The send(data) method transmits data using the connection. If the readyState attribute is CONN
- StreamBuilder threshold
Monday, 16 January 2012
Sunday, 15 January 2012
- [Bug 15578] New: hi all, po polsku to będzie trudniejsze do zrozumienia, prawda?
- RE: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- [Bug 15563] I need my deleted web history
- [Bug 15563] New: I need my deleted web history
Saturday, 14 January 2012
- [Bug 15554] Hi, The article is very good. Also user can view. HTML5 Web Workers http://www.totaldotnet.com/Article/ShowArticle145_HTML5WebWorker.aspx
- [Bug 15554] New: Hi, The article is very good. Also user can view. HTML5 Web Workers http://www.totaldotnet.com/Article/ShowArticle145_HTML5WebWorker.aspx
Friday, 13 January 2012
- Re: Use Cases for Connectionless Push support in Webapps recharter
- Re: File modification
- Re: File modification
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- [indexeddb] Do we need to support keyPaths with an empty string?
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- RE: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: File modification
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- RE: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- RE: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- RE: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: Use Cases for Connectionless Push support in Webapps recharter
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- [Bug 14985] Specify how autoincrement + empty keypath works
Thursday, 12 January 2012
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: File modification
- Re: File modification
- Re: Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- Re: File modification
- RE: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: File modification
- Re: CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: File modification
- Re: File modification
- Re: File modification
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: File modification
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: File modification
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- [Bug 15533] Index check in selection.extend() should be done before node type test.
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: Testing Expectations
- Re: [editing] tab in an editable area WAS: [whatwg] behavior when typing in contentEditable elements
- Re: [editing] tab in an editable area WAS: [whatwg] behavior when typing in contentEditable elements
- Selection of a document that doesn't have a window
- Testing Expectations (was: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization)
- [Bug 15532] Collapsing or extending to a ProcessingInstruction should be OK
- Re: File modification
- Re: File modification
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- [Bug 15533] New: Index check in selection.extend() should be done before node type test.
- [Bug 15532] New: Collapsing or extending to a ProcessingInstruction should be OK
- CfC: to add Speech API to Charter; deadline January 19
- Re: File modification
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: [File API]: "Determining encoding"
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
Thursday, 12 January 2012
- RE: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: [editing] tab in an editable area WAS: [whatwg] behavior when typing in contentEditable elements
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- RE: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: String to ArrayBuffer
- String to ArrayBuffer
- Re: File modification
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: [File API]: "Determining encoding"
- Re: File modification
- [Bug 15527] New: Allow div (and maybe br) as a paragraph separator
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: File modification
- Re: [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Re: File modification
- Re: File modification
- Re: File modification
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: [editing] tab in an editable area WAS: [whatwg] behavior when typing in contentEditable elements
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: [editing] Avoiding selections with no corresponding range, to simplify authoring
- RE: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: [editing] Avoiding selections with no corresponding range, to simplify authoring
- Re: [editing] Avoiding selections with no corresponding range, to simplify authoring
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- [Bug 15524] New: Specify something about drag and drop behavior
- [Bug 15470] Changing the selection creates a Range object
- [editing] Avoiding selections with no corresponding range, to simplify authoring
- [Bug 15523] New: Define "tab" command
- Re: [editing] tab in an editable area WAS: [whatwg] behavior when typing in contentEditable elements
- [Bug 15522] New: Add execCommand() to Element
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- [xhr] responseType for sync requests in window context
- Re: [editing] tab in an editable area WAS: [whatwg] behavior when typing in contentEditable elements
Tuesday, 10 January 2012
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: File modification
- Re: File modification
- Re: [editing] tab in an editable area WAS: [whatwg] behavior when typing in contentEditable elements
- File modification
- Colliding FileWriters
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: [editing] Feedback Link?
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- [Bug 15509] New: Define HTTP handling of data URLs (and maybe other URLs)
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob protocol version - is this needed?
- Re: [editing] tab in an editable area WAS: [whatwg] behavior when typing in contentEditable elements
- [Bug 15134] Please explain what the proper behavior of getSelection on a display:none iframe is
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- [Bug 15495] New: I need some way of recovering from longer but still temporary failures, without requiring a complete page refresh, and without requiring every all events of interest to be rebound, or otherwise handled differently from any other event. This isn't an issue
- [Bug 15494] New: author request headers: Content-Transfer-Encoding
- Worry on Enum type - binding seems inconsistently defined
- Re: querySelectorAll() -- selecting _immediate_ children of element
Monday, 9 January 2012
- Requirements for new work [Was: Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API]
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: [CORS] Does "Origin" have to be included in the "Access-Control-Request-Headers" field?
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- [Bug 15470] New: Changing the selection creates a Range object
- querySelectorAll() -- selecting _immediate_ children of element
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: Use Cases for Connectionless Push support in Webapps recharter
Sunday, 8 January 2012
- [editing] Feedback Link?
- [Bug 15456] my name:-arindam sarkar,address-koblaschoolpara,purbasthali,kalna,vidyanagar,burdwan,741316,india,westbengal. my mobile-09475921257 , my gmail:-491043@gmail.com MY PAN/GIR-BUBPS9425D , SO MY REQUEST PLEASE HELP ME.
- [Bug 15456] New: my name:-arindam sarkar,address-koblaschoolpara,purbasthali,kalna,vidyanagar,burdwan,741316,india,westbengal. my mobile-09475921257 , my gmail:-491043@gmail.com MY PAN/GIR-BUBPS9425D , SO MY REQUEST PLEASE HELP ME.
- Re: [editing] tab in an editable area WAS: [whatwg] behavior when typing in contentEditable elements
Saturday, 7 January 2012
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
Friday, 6 January 2012
Saturday, 7 January 2012
- [editing] tab in an editable area WAS: [whatwg] behavior when typing in contentEditable elements
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: Pressing Enter in contenteditable: <p> or <br> or <div>?
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
Friday, 6 January 2012
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: Use Cases for Connectionless Push support in Webapps recharter
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- RE: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: Security bug in XmlHttpRequest, setRequestHeader()
- Re: Security bug in XmlHttpRequest, setRequestHeader()
Thursday, 5 January 2012
- Security bug in XmlHttpRequest, setRequestHeader()
- [Bug 15434] New: [IndexedDB] Detail steps for assigning a key to a value
- Affiliation change
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization
- RE: [IndexedDB] (editorial) outdated example in "3.2.1 The IDBRequest Interface" section
- Re: before/after editaction
- Re: Use Cases for Connectionless Push support in Webapps recharter
- Re: Use Cases for Connectionless Push support in Webapps recharter
Wednesday, 4 January 2012
- Re: Priorities and expectations for 2012
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- [Bug 15418] New: sort out HTTP auth
- [Bug 15417] New: Redirects and the base URL
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
Tuesday, 3 January 2012
- Use Cases for Connectionless Push support in Webapps recharter
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21
- [Bug 15400] New: WebSocket Protocol reference needs updating
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Happy New Year 2012
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?