- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:52:57 +0100
- To: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:24:23 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 10:58, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> Cameron has addressed the comments from Web IDL LC#3 [1] and the bug >> list only contains two enhancement requests [2]. As such, this is a call >> for consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL using the >> following ED as the basis: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/ >> >> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's >> decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for >> Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process >> Document: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs >> >> Positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be >> considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for comments is >> March 26 and all comments should be sent to public-webapps at w3.org >> (http://w3.org). >> > Would be nice if there was a test suite before progressing to CR… Indeed. It would be nice to have a pony. I support the proposal. cheers Chaals -- Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 11:53:34 UTC