- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:03:11 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- cc: ext Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > Hixie - what are your thoughts on these UCs and how they would be > spec'ed? For example, would they be in a different spec, an L.next type > spec? Well there's two parts to it: the protocol, and the API. If there's an existing protocol for this and the browser vendors are interested in implementing it, I see no reason why we couldn't support this alongside the current text/event-stream-based API in the HTML standard, either as part of the same API or as a separate API (like WebSockets). If it needs a new protocol, then that should probably be addressed first. HTH, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 13 January 2012 23:03:51 UTC