- From: João Eiras <joaoe@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:27:41 +0100
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:24 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Marcos Caceres: >> So… given that one can fake create a DOMException, and unless there >> is a valid reason not to allow this that I don't know of…. It would >> be nice if DOMException just defined a public constructor. This would >> allow clean prototyping of various APIs in ECMAScript (and give us >> poor saps who don't know C a chance to implement some Web APIs :) ). > > Web IDL already requires exception interface objects like DOMException > to be constructable, due to this: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#es-exception-call > > and them being Function objects. The constructor should take a single > argument which is the message. DOMExceptions have both a code and a message. Perhaps the constructor should be extended to include both.
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 14:28:20 UTC