Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote:

> Hi Brona,
>
> For mostly historical reasons, WebApps' File* specs still use Tracker
> rather than Bugzilla (and IIRC, Arun also uses the list archive as well as
> the spec itself to track issues for the File API spec):
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2008/**webapps/track/products<http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products>
>
> For consistency, it would be good to move these specs to Bugzilla but I
> also don't want to create any "make work" for the Editors. (Arun, Jonas,
> EricU - if you want Bugzilla components for these specs, please let me know
> and I'll ask MikeSmith to create them.)
>

FYI - I previously asked Jonas about this and he didn't seem to be aware of
the Tracker entries and thought that lack of a Bugzilla component was just
an oversight.  So at least one of the editors probably wouldn't mind.  I
asked because I was trying to file a bug/feature request, which still isn't
tracked anywhere.

--
Steve


>
> -AB
>
> On 12/21/11 3:21 AM, ext Bronislav Klučka wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/file-**system-api/#widl-FileEntry-**file<http://www.w3.org/TR/file-system-api/#widl-FileEntry-file>
>> says that successCallback is "A callback that is called with the
>> newFileWriter." there should be "A callback that is called with the File"
>>
>> BTW  was trying to file that bug myself, but I could not find suitable
>> component in WebAppsWG product.
>>
>> Brona
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 01:04:55 UTC