- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:13:16 +0200
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- CC: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org>
On 02/24/2012 02:10 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: > Just to be clear on this: what is the status of mutation observers? They are in DOM 4. The API may still change a bit, but there is already one implementation, and another one close to ready. > If > there any chance shadow dom beats mutation observers to > standardization? AFAIK, shadow DOM is quite far from being stable. > I don't think so, but just checking... If that turned > out to be the case it could be crippling shadow dom until such a time.. > > Brian > > On Feb 23, 2012 6:46 PM, "Dimitri Glazkov" <dglazkov@chromium.org > <mailto:dglazkov@chromium.org>> wrote: > > Sounds good. Filed a bug here: > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16096 > > :DG< > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org > <mailto:rniwa@webkit.org>> wrote: > > Can we disallow mutation events inside shadow DOM? > > > > There is no legacy content that depends on mutation events API > inside shadow > > DOM, and we have a nice spec & implementation of new mutation > observer API > > already. > > > > FYI, https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79278 > > > > Best, > > Ryosuke Niwa > > Software Engineer > > Google Inc. > > > > >
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 00:13:43 UTC