Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again

On 01/24/2012 08:33 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> The problem is that the proposal (as I understand it) is to insert
> something like:
> "DOM2 (a REC) is obsolete. Use DOM4 (a work in progress)."
> This addition is tantamount (by the reading of some) to demoting the status
> of DOM2 to "a work in progress".

Not at all; it's a work on which progress has stopped long ago.

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 19:36:50 UTC