Re: [IndexedDB] Multientry with invalid keys

Thanks. Based on this, I agree that in the multiEntry scenario at the start
of this thread, 3 is the more consistent result.


On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>wrote:

>  I’ve created a bug to track this issue:****
>
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16211****
>
> ** **
>
> Israel****
>
> ** **
>
> On Friday, March 02, 2012 4:39 PM, Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote:****
>
> From: "Israel Hilerio" <israelh@microsoft.com>****
>
> > Unfortunately, we didn’t update the spec to reflect this agreement.****
>
> > You or I could open a bug to ensure the spec is updated to capture****
>
> > this change.****
>
> ** **
>
> Yes, better get it into the spec :-)****
>
> ** **
>
> About the behavior itself, FWIW, I think it's a reasonable one.****
>
> ** **
>
> --****
>
> Odin, Opera****
>