On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>wrote: > > From: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc> > > I think we've been feature complete for a while now. With one > > exception, which is that some error handling that we've discussed on > > the list needs to be edited into the spec. > > > > Apart from that we have a number of fairly minor uncontroversial fixes > > (details around generators, order in objectStore/index lists etc), and > > one more controversial fix (numeric vs. string constants). But these > > aren't new features by any means. > > > > I think the stuff that we have bugs on are mostly things that everyone > > agree that we can and should fix for v1 since they are mostly defining > > things that are currently undefined. > > There's one other bug that I wouldn't classify as minor, the one about > getting an API for enumerating databases[1]. But other than that I agree. > > I'd love to see the currently open issues fixed though ;-) > > > 1. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16137 Are there implementations of the IDB*Sync APIs for Workers? Chromium has not yet implemented this rather large part of the spec, and last I checked (admittedly, some time ago) no-one else had either. This may have changed. If not, I'm worried there may be non-minor issues lurking there that will only be identified during implementation. (I'm a fan of the IETF's "two genetically distinct implementations" guidance for non-trivial specs.)
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 19:14:22 UTC