On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Steve VanDeBogart <vandebo@google.com>wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote: > >> Hi Brona, >> >> For mostly historical reasons, WebApps' File* specs still use Tracker >> rather than Bugzilla (and IIRC, Arun also uses the list archive as well as >> the spec itself to track issues for the File API spec): >> >> http://www.w3.org/2008/**webapps/track/products<http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products> >> >> For consistency, it would be good to move these specs to Bugzilla but I >> also don't want to create any "make work" for the Editors. (Arun, Jonas, >> EricU - if you want Bugzilla components for these specs, please let me know >> and I'll ask MikeSmith to create them.) >> > > FYI - I previously asked Jonas about this and he didn't seem to be aware > of the Tracker entries and thought that lack of a Bugzilla component was > just an oversight. So at least one of the editors probably wouldn't mind. > I asked because I was trying to file a bug/feature request, which still > isn't tracked anywhere. > Sorry, I missed that this was already handled. Please ignore. -- Steve > >> -AB >> >> On 12/21/11 3:21 AM, ext Bronislav Klučka wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/file-**system-api/#widl-FileEntry-**file<http://www.w3.org/TR/file-system-api/#widl-FileEntry-file> >>> says that successCallback is "A callback that is called with the >>> newFileWriter." there should be "A callback that is called with the File" >>> >>> BTW was trying to file that bug myself, but I could not find suitable >>> component in WebAppsWG product. >>> >>> Brona >>> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 01:09:54 UTC