> > Per #4 Testing commitment(s): can you elaborate on what you would like to >> see at this point? >> > > At this point, I think a `warm fuzzy` like "if/when the spec advances to > Candidate Recommendation, we will contribute to a test suite that is > sufficient to exit the CR" would be useful. Yes we will contribute to a test suite that is sufficient for the Candidate Recommendation. > Also, what is the next step? >> > > WRT the API you proposed, I think we have enough preliminary feedback for > me to start a CfC to add the API to WebApps charter. My only concern is the > open question (at least to me) re the markup part. It seems like it would > be useful to review the proposed API and markup together. However, a CfC > for the markup can be done separately (provided sufficient > interest/commitment is expressed). > In the spirit of starting with the basics and iterating we did not include markup in the proposed API. Markup support also renders cleanly as a layer on top of the JS API with few additions, so as you suggest if there is sufficient interest/commitment a separate CfC could be done.
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 15:20:37 UTC