On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 1/13/12 1:28 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Boris Zbarsky<bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >> >>> I would prefer a definition that doesn't involve defaultView, actually. >>> I >>> don't expect browsers to converge defaultView behavior any time in the >>> near >>> or medium future, so the testability would be illusory: tests would just >>> depend on whether browsers implement defaultView "correctly"... >>> >> >> What well-defined alternative do you suggest? >> > > I'm not sure. There's basically zero browser compat here in the hard > cases.... We could define it in terms of defaultView (or browsing context) and put our effort into getting interoperability on defaultView?
Received on Friday, 13 January 2012 22:13:42 UTC