- From: Bronislav Klučka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:03:18 +0100
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 14.2.2012 5:56, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Ian Hickson<ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Arun Ranganathan wrote: >>> 2. Could we modify things so that img.src = blob is a reality? Mainly, >>> if we modify things for the *most common* use case, that could be useful >>> in mitigating some of our fears. Hixie, is this possible? >> Anything's possible, but I think the pain here would far outweigh the >> benefits. There would be some really hard questions to answer, too (e.g. >> what would innerHTML return? If you copied such an image from a >> contentEditable section and pasted it lower down the same section, would >> it still have the image?). > We could define that it returns an empty src attribute, which would > break the copy/paste example. That's the same behavior you'd get with > someone revoking the URL upon load anyway. > > / Jonas > To the point of reusability of blob url and actual existence of such URL, we must also consider non-media usage: a element, window.open, etc. I do see the ideal of preparing data with JS and letting them be displayed/downloaded using those methods as quite usefull and intuitive. Brona
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 19:03:51 UTC