- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:59:29 -0500
- To: Yonathan <yonathan@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 23:59:57 UTC
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Yonathan <yonathan@gmail.com> wrote: > Should the specification encourage onsuccess for reads and oncomplete for writes? > I don't think any amount of documentation is going to stop this from being confusing. Committing transactions should really have been an explicit request with its own result, and returning to the event loop without committing should have rolled back the transaction. (What does "when a transaction can no longer become active" mean? It doesn't seem to be defined.) -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 23:59:57 UTC