Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

On Tuesday, February 28, 2012, Odin HÝrthe Omdal wrote:

> > From: "Jonas Sicking" <>
> > I think we've been feature complete for a while now. With one
> > exception, which is that some error handling that we've discussed on
> > the list needs to be edited into the spec.
> >
> > Apart from that we have a number of fairly minor uncontroversial fixes
> > (details around generators, order in objectStore/index lists etc), and
> > one more controversial fix (numeric vs. string constants). But these
> > aren't new features by any means.
> >
> > I think the stuff that we have bugs on are mostly things that everyone
> > agree that we can and should fix for v1 since they are mostly defining
> > things that are currently undefined.
> There's one other bug that I wouldn't classify as minor, the one about
> getting an API for enumerating databases[1]. But other than that I agree.
> I'd love to see the currently open issues fixed though ;-)

We discussed such an API a while ago but decided to punt on it to v2.

It's nontrivial, but doable, to implement since I think that we should
guarantee that the list of databases returned in the success event should
be guaranteed to be the correct list until the success event handler
returns and that open/delete calls that happen during the success handler
should therefor be dependable.

I think both IE and Chrome has added prefixed functions in the meantime

/ Jonas

Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 06:47:19 UTC