Re: [XHR] responseType "json"

On 2012-01-06 17:20, Glenn Maynard wrote:
 > ...
> Big -1 to perpetuating UTF-16 and UTF-32 due to braindamage in an IETF spec.
> ...

You seem to feel strongly about this (and I might agree for UTF-32).

How about raising this issue in a place where there's an actual chance 
to cause changes? (-> IETF apps-discuss)

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 16:28:32 UTC