- From: Bronislav Klučka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:12:10 +0100
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
On 14.2.2012 15:20, Glenn Maynard wrote: > 2012/2/14 Bronislav Klučka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com > <mailto:Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>> > > The point of reusable Blob URL is the compatibility with regular > URL, not having reusable URL would create unpleasant dichotomy in > data manipulating... > > > The point is avoiding the error-prone need to release resources by hand. > > -- > Glenn Maynard > Yes, that is why we have this thread, I was talking about Blob URL... I'm trying to find solution that would solve both (sure, I do not mind explicit release). I do not want solution where working with set of images would require to traverse through all images and somehow trying to determine whether images is regular URL or blob and go through 2 different branches. Suggestions like "We could define that it returns an empty src attribute" prohibits any additional working with such image... accessing such image tells me nothing... is such image Blob image? Is it new empty image? Brona
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 15:12:38 UTC