- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:58:31 +0100
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "Israel Hilerio" <israelh@microsoft.com>, "James Robinson" <jamesr@google.com>, Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Joshua Bell" <jsbell@chromium.org>, "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:33:15 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > Last I think I heard it was in relation to renaming CORS headers which > also is in WD stage. I have proposed renaming them if that is what you mean; people objected. > We could certainly try to make this change when unprefixing, but at > that point I think it'll create more confusion and messyness than the > value it introduces. Why? The confusion is temporary, the API will be here for the lifetime of the platform. Your value trade-off seems questionable to me. >> I don't think I'm necessarily the right person, but I've pointed out >> that I think DOMStringList and numeric constants should go. > > I still don't have a good enough understanding of what DOMString[] > means as far as being immutable goes. Possibly it's also something we > can change in v2. By then people might rely on the contains() method or some such. There's a readonly DOMString[], Web IDL has details. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 18:59:15 UTC