- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:35:09 -0700
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jarred Nicholls <jarred@webkit.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Derp! Apologies for sending a dead link. Here's the link to the first draft: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/c387b50a991a/spec/templates/index.html I also left an unfinished sentence in the status update. Awesome work, Dimitri. The sentence should read: "Even though it may not be possible to fully emulate the shadow DOM on legacy rendering engines, we will try to have at least a functional equivalent." :DG< On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure... Note that tip is in the "wrong" link I sent too, it's just > pointing to the wrong doc :) > I was just noting that I got it from the "latest version of this doc" > link in that revision which is (currently) actually pointing to the > tip of shadow, not templates. > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jarred Nicholls <jarred@webkit.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Whoops... that does not appear to be the same file. Appears that the >>> repo points to >>> >>> >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/c2f82425ba8d/spec/templates/index.html >>> >> >> FYI "tip" will point to the latest >> revision: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html >> >>> >>> However in that doc listed as the latest editors draft is the one for >>> shadow I included below. ?? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > on: >>> > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/spec/templates/index.html >>> > as listed below, it returns "error: revision not found: spec". >>> > >>> > I think it should be: >>> > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/shadow/index.html >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> >>> > wrote: >>> >> Hello, public-webapps! >>> >> >>> >> Here's another summary of work, happening in Web Components. >>> >> >>> >> SHADOW DOM >>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/showdependencytree.cgi?id=14978) >>> >> * First bits of the Shadow DOM test suite have landed: >>> >> >>> >> http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ShadowDOM/tests/submissions/Google/tests.html >>> >> * More work in spec, long tail of edge cases and bugs: >>> >> - You can now select elements, distributed into insertion points >>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16176) >>> >> - A bug in adjusting event's relatedTarget was discovered and fixed >>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16176) >>> >> - As a result of examining Viewlink (an IE feature), more events are >>> >> now stopped at the boundary >>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15804) >>> >> - Fixed a bug around scoping of styles >>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16318) >>> >> * Started restructuring CSS-related parts of the spec to accommodate >>> >> these new features: >>> >> - Specify a way to select host element >>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15220) >>> >> - Consider a notion of shared stylesheet >>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15818) >>> >> - Consider a flag for resetting inherited styles at the shadow >>> >> boundary (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15820) >>> >> * Experimental support of Shadow DOM in WebKit is slowly, but surely >>> >> gaining multiple shadow DOM subtree support >>> >> (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77503) >>> >> >>> >> HTML TEMPLATES >>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/showdependencytree.cgi?id=15476): >>> >> * First draft of the specification is ready for review: >>> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/spec/templates/index.html. >>> >> * Most mechanical parts are written as deltas to the HTML spec, which >>> >> offers an interesting question of whether this spec should just be >>> >> part of HTML. >>> >> >>> >> CODE SAMPLES >>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/showdependencytree.cgi?id=14956): >>> >> * Web Components Polyfill >>> >> (https://github.com/dglazkov/Web-Components-Polyfill) now has unit >>> >> tests and a good bit of test coverage. Contributions are appreciated. >>> >> Even though it may not >>> >> >>> >> ADDITIONAL WAYS TO STAY UPDATED: >>> >> * https://plus.google.com/b/103330502635338602217/ >>> >> * http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/rss-log >>> >> * follow the meta bugs for each section. >>> >> >>> >> :DG< >>> >> >>> >>
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 16:35:43 UTC