- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:26:48 +0100
- To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:02:55 +0100, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/24/2012 01:58 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> * Ms2ger wrote: >>> The recent message to www-dom about DOM2HTML [1] made me realize that >>> we still haven't added warnings to obsolete DOM specifications to >>> hopefully avoid that people use them as a reference. >> >> If you want to say more than that the specifications are no longer being >> maintained and which newer specifications might contain more recent de- >> finitions for the features covered you will have to create a process for >> that first (it would require Advisory Committee review for instance, as >> otherwise you are likely to create unnecessary drama). > > I should have been clearer; this is indeed all I intend to say. OK, this looks like the sort of message that Opera would support. As Art said, I think we need individual proposals per spec. And I am not sure that rescinding specs we don't like much is necessarily a good idea. cheers -- Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 12:27:26 UTC