- From: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:12:21 +0100
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 03/12/2012 06:02 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:10:19 +0100, Stefan Hakansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > >> The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly >> wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to >> enable support of use cases such as incoming calls. And in certain >> scenarios the resource use (e.g. power) is very important. >> >> However, this kind of functionality is not in scope of the webrtc WG, >> but seems to belong to the Web Applications WG. So this is a message >> that the webrtc WG is interested in seeing technology that supports this >> being developed. We have also noted discussions in Web Apps around use >> cases for connection-less push: >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/0008.html> >> - especially the third one is very relevant for us. >> >> Stefan and Harald (chairs) for the webrtc WG. > > In the current charter proposal (which is under review at the moment) we > have > > [[[ > Server-Sent Events > An API for opening an HTTP connection for receiving push notifications > from a server in the form of DOM events. The API is designed such that it > can be extended to work with other push notification schemes such as Push > SMS. > ]]] - http://www.w3.org/2012/03/webapps-proposed-charter.html > > I'm not sure if that is enough, sounds like you would like something more. I think Bryan summarized quite well the other day what there is interest in beyond Server-Sent Events. > In which case the best thing is to get people who are interested in > developing it to say so, through their review and in this working group. Makes sense. Thanks, Stefan > > cheers > > Chaals >
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 17:12:49 UTC