Re: CG for Speech JavaScript API

Hi Satish,

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:50:25 +0100, Satish S <satish@google.com> wrote:

>> Re the mail list, if we turn this around and look at it from the
>> perspective of someone that is mostly interested in the CG and not  
>> WebApps, they would then receive close to an additional 2K emails
>> per quarter.
>
>>  I really don't think you want that so I recommend against using
>> public-webapps.
>
> Speech API discussions could use a "[speech api]" prefix in the email
> subject so that participants can filter emails based on that. I see this
> style being used by File API and possibly others in the webapps mailing
> list.

True, but those are deliverables of the Web Apps group. Which already has  
a number of deliverables, and a lot of mail traffic for work it has agreed  
to take on. We have already moved various kinds of work to other lists to  
reduce that traffic.

> As Glen mentioned keeping discussions in the webapps mailing list
> will provide visibility to a wider audience, with a balanced web-centric
> view for new JavaScript APIs.

The wider audience are welcome to subscribe to a list for the group  
working on the API - but they may not want to. The fact that you add  
messages to people's inbox doesn't mean that they will read them, as we  
all know already. I do not think it is reasonable to use this list for the  
work given that it has not been accepted as a work item by the group.

Cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com

Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 14:52:32 UTC