- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:26:06 +0100
- To: "public-webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:43:26 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > Further explanation from Apple... > > ------- Forwarded message ------- ... >>> 2. Speech is an area with IPR -- it's been an active research area for >>> decades; we may have some. Without doing a lot more work I don't know >>> the extent to which the proposed work would encounter IPR, but I think >>> it would be prudent to think about that. It may be best to have the >>> work done in a less general-purpose WG (though, as I say above, I >>> don't think WebApps should really be seen as general-purpose), and >>> actively seek to set a scope and a membership that minimize issues >>> down the road. This feedback has been essentially replicated but more forcefully in Team-confidential responses. While it is theoretically possible to put the proposal in the charter anyway, in practice it will just get shot down in AC review by Team-confidential responses, so it would be a waste of time. Given that, there is not consensus to add the item. Chairs Chaals (and Art) -- Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 14:26:34 UTC