- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:41:53 +0100
- To: "Stefan Hakansson LK" <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "Travis Leithead" <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "Feras Moussa" <ferasm@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:05:05 +0100, Feras Moussa <ferasm@microsoft.com> wrote: > When designing the StreamBuilder API, we looked at it as a more > primitive API which other abstractions (such as multiple consumers) can > be built upon. We should not have a StreamBuilder API. We should have a Stream constructor, similar to how we should not have a BlobBuilder API, but a Blob constructor (and we do now, I believe). It's a lot cleaner and in line with best practices for platform API design (which are undocumented, unfortunately). -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 5 February 2012 11:44:50 UTC