- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:57:54 +1100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
João Eiras: >> DOMExceptions have both a code and a message. Perhaps the >> constructor should be extended to include both. Anne van Kesteren: > code is legacy, but name would be good to expose. The constructor has the same signature as the standard ECMAScript Error constructors, so we are being consistent there. I think it's fine for code and name to be assigned after creating the object, if JS needs to create a DOMException object (which I don't expect to be a common thing anyway).
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 23:58:28 UTC